internet-drafts/pep-keyreset/draft-marques-pep-keyreset.mkd

101 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2019-04-25 15:42:54 +02:00
---
coding: utf-8
title: "pretty Easy privacy (pEp): Key Reset"
abbrev: pretty Easy privacy (pEp) Key Reset
docname: draft-marques-pep-keyreset-00
category: std
stand_alone: yes
pi: [toc, sortrefs, symrefs, comments]
author:
{::include ../shared/author_tags/hernani_marques.mkd}
normative:
# RFC3156:
RFC4949:
# RFC5322:
RFC7435:
# I-D.birk-pep:
I-D.marques-pep-handshake:
# I-D.marques-pep-rating:
informative:
# RFC4880:
# RFC6973:
# RFC5321:
# RFC7258:
# RFC7942:
# RFC8280:
# I-D.luck-lamps-pep-header-protection:
# I-D.marques-pep-email:
I-D.birk-pep-trustwords:
2019-07-04 19:24:44 +02:00
# I-D.hoeneisen-pep-keysync:
2019-04-25 15:42:54 +02:00
{::include ../shared/references/isoc-btn.mkd}
{::include ../shared/references/implementation-status.mkd}
--- abstract
TBD
--- middle
# Introduction
\[\[ TODO \]\]
## Relationship to other pEp documents
\[\[ TODO \]\]
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/key-words-rfc2119.mkd}
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/terms-intro.mkd}
2019-04-25 15:42:54 +02:00
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/handshake.mkd}
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/trustwords.mkd}
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/tofu.mkd}
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/mitm.mkd}
# Security Considerations
\[\[ TODO \]\]
# Privacy Considerations
\[\[ TODO \]\]
# IANA Considerations
This document has no actions for IANA.
{::include ../shared/text-blocks/implementation-status.mkd}
# Acknowledgements
Special thanks go to Krista Bennett and Volker Birk for the reference
implementation on pEp and the ideas leading to this draft.
This work was initially created by pEp Foundation, and will be reviewed and
extended with funding by the Internet Society's Beyond the Net Programme on
standardizing pEp. {{ISOC.bnet}}
--- back
# Document Changelog
\[\[ RFC Editor: This section is to be removed before publication \]\]
* draft-marques-pep-keyreset-00:
* Initial version
# Open Issues
\[\[ RFC Editor: This section should be empty and is to be removed
before publication \]\]
2019-05-29 17:10:52 +02:00
* Check whether in IETF there is a concept of "technical messages",
i.e. messages that are meant for the client, but not for the user.