Per RFC 5246, Note: this extension is not meaningful for TLS versions prior to 1.2. Clients MUST NOT offer it if they are offering prior versions. However, even if clients do offer it, the rules specified in [TLSEXT] require servers to ignore extensions they do not understand. Although second sentence would suggest that there would be no interop problems in always offering the extension, WebRTC has reported issues with Bouncy Castle on < TLS 1.2 ClientHellos that still include signature_algorithms. See also https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=4223 RT#4390 Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>master
parent
3105d69535
commit
f7aa318552
Loading…
Reference in new issue